Printer Friendly Version Email A Friend Add This Increase Text Size Decrease Text Size

BLACK & WHITE: HOW DOES THE AMA SCORE FIRST-TURN CRASHERS? AND DO THEY REALLY RELY ON PRACTICE TIMES?

Believe it or not, if you fall two feet off the gate, you can still beat a guy who makes it all the way around the track
  

The Jacksonville Supercross was the most significant event of the 2011 AMA Supercross series. It was significant for three reasons: (1) Ryan Villopoto failed to qualify for the main event and put his chances of winning the 2011 Supercross Championship in jeopardy. Villopoto eventually fought back from the deficit to take the title. (2) James Stewart's first-turn crash in the main event ended his night and was part of a crash-and-burn meltdown that James never recovered from. (3) The Stewart crash brought up a little-known AMA Supercross rule about how riders involved in first-turn crashes are scored. When James Stewart, Matt Goerke and Weston Peick crashed in Jacksonville's right-hand first turn, the AMA scored Stewart as 18th place (3 points), Goerke 19th (2 points) and Peick 20th (1 point). When the results were posted, there were howls of protest. It seemed like blatant favoritism to the causal fan. But, there is a story behind the decision. How did the AMA determine the three riders' finishing positions? Should they have used a different method? You be the judge.
 
WHITE


THE SECRET RULE BOOK:
Under an AMA rule that is not in the printed 2011 AMA Supercross rule book, the AMA awards finishing positions to every rider who fails to finish the first lap based on his qualifying times. Thus, under this system, Stewart, who had set the fastest time in practice, was awarded 18th, while Goerke (17th in timed practice) and Peick (20th) were given 19th and 20th place.

WHY IT MATTERS
: In the grand scheme of the 2011 Supercross season, the awarding of points is important because it is the collection of points that determines who wins the 450 Supercross Championship. At the end of the 2011 series, Ryan Villopoto won the title by four points over Chad Reed. Thus, who gets scored, how many points they are assigned, and the method by which points are awarded, 'especially on a rider's worst nightm, are all crucial elements in determining a champion.

WHY THEY DO IT THAT WAY:
The AMA claims that their system is the only method they can use, because none of the three riders at Jacksonville came around to the scoring transponder at the finish line; thus none were ever officially scored.

THE REAL REASON:
The fact that the AMA thought first-turn crashes through, to the point of developing a rule that resorts back to timed qualifying, means that they understood that scoring a first-turn pileup was important. On the other hand, they didn't feel that they could come up with any other system that would accurately assess where each rider actually finished. It was simpler and easier to fall back on timed qualifying.

BLACK


THE RULE'S INHERENT FLAW:
When questioned about the idea of scoring riders based on something that happened earlier in the day (timed qualifying), the AMA said that it was the only fair method of doing it. In truth, the fairest way of doing it would be to score the rider that went the farthest on the track more points than the riders who didn't travel as far. When given this option, the AMA asked how they could determine who went the farthest. The answer was also in the AMA rule book. Under AMA rule 4.22, section i, a video camera may be used to aid scorekeepers in determining finishing order of a close race. Since every AMA Supercross is videotaped, all the AMA has to do is review the tape and make a judgment call about which rider went the farthest.

WHY IT MATTERS:
All scoring is based on who covers the most ground in the shortest amount of time. The winner is the man who gets to the finish line first, lapped riders are scored by where they finished in terms of how many laps they went, and riders who fall on the first lap should also be scored based on the fact that they went farther before they fell than the other guy.

THE REAL REASON:
Imagine how unfair it would be to Matt Goerke if he started the race and made it all the way around the track only to fall 10 feet before the finish line on lap one, and then to discover that another rider fell directly off the starting gate and was scored ahead of him. That is what happened at Jacksonville. Stewart was 10 feet behind Goerke. Thus, in the real world, Goerke beat Stewart. It was not the other way around.



MAY 2012, VOLUME 40, NUMBER 5
SUBSCRIBE NOW & SAVE:

- Print Magazine
- Digital Magazine





ON SALE
- Subscribe
- Digital Sample
- Store
 - Advertise
- Contact
- Digital Sub
MAY 2012, VOLUME 40, NUMBER 5
MORE STUFF
- MXA Wrecking Crew
- Jody's Box
- Every Champ
- FAQs
- Race Schedules
- Ask The MXPerts
- Mid-Week Report
- Vintage MX Bikes







Copyright Hi-Torque Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
motocross news -motocross bike test - motocross features -motocross product reviews -motocross photos motocross videos
Honda MX Tests - Husqvarna MX Test - Kawasaki MX Tests - KTM MX Tests - Suzuki MX Tests - Yamaha MX Tests

WARNING: Much of the action de­pict­­ed in this magazine is potentially dan­gerous. Virtually all of the riders seen in our photos are experienced ex­­perts or professionals. Do not at­tempt to duplicate any stunts that are be­­yond your own capabilities. Always wear the appropriate safety gear.